Lay on Me your guilt and sins.
Henceforth they shall be Mine.
Receive for them My righteousness.
Our Father says:
“It is forever thine.”
Bethany and Concordia Online
Our congregations are really people, though it’s easy to think of them as institutions that exist without the people. The people of our congregations are diverse, especially in background, age, work, and education. Some have what Kim Komando calls the “digital lifestyle,” while others are quite happy without any electronic gadgets beside their phone and radio. As a result, there are many differences between us in the way we understand the Internet and how to use it.
This post is a quick guide that may help to bring us all onto the same page in the way we use our online tools. There are also members who don’t use the Internet at all, and that’s fine. But if you do, as a member of Bethany or Concordia, then you are part of Bethany and Concordia’s online presence.
Since we have such a wide variety of experience online, I have to apologize to some for being overly basic in parts of this post. It may even seem pedantic, but please remember that not everyone has the experience that you do. For those with less experience, there may be things here that are quite new to you, and even hard to digest. So please accept my apologies if I don’t introduce something clearly, and feel free to ask for clarification in a comment to this post! As for myself, I have had an online presence for many years now, but the online landscape has changed dramatically, and there are some things that I have little interest in pursuing, like Twitter, and constant attention to Facebook.
How we are online, and why it matters
First, we should understand that there are several ways people can be online, each with different limitations. Today, many people have begun using smartphones to be online, and they carry these phones at all times. It allows them to receive and send messages, and to view web pages any time, anywhere. The limitations are in the tiny size of the screen, which can’t present much information compared to a large computer screen, and a slow and error-prone text entry system, which tends to make messages short.
Then there are traditional desktop computers, which are very convenient and ergonomic for reading, writing, and just about everything else. The limitation is that they are stuck in one place.
In between are laptops, which offer most of the advantages of desktop computers, but are portable, and tablets, which are like oversized smartphones, with keyboards sold separately.
We each have different habits and preferences in the way we connect to the Internet. For example, I can’t see spending my money on a smartphone, but I do have an inexpensive 7″ tablet that I can carry everywhere. But I find the tablet frustrating when I need to write an email longer than a few words.
Likewise, I’ve noticed that many people (most probably using smartphones) prefer to exchange messages on Facebook instead of email. Others, like me, still prefer email. Some prefer text messaging on their mobile phone. But nobody really likes to receive messages that they consider inappropriate for any reason. (More on that later.)
By understanding that we are not all online in the same way, and that we have different preferences, we can better communicate with each other online, and be more sympathetic to the preferences of others. Gone are the days of a single telephone in each kitchen with an enormous cord that could stretch across the house. Now, communication opportunities are better, but also much more complex.
Message Netiquette
“Internet etiquette” is abbreviated as “netiquette.” It tells us what our online neighbors expect from us, and what we should expect from them, in order to get along well with each other. One of the important things the Internet allows is quick and convenient communication, but just as with telephones and postal mail, there are some informal rules.
The standby for Internet messaging is email. Some people read in their browser, some on their phone or tablet, some in a desktop or laptop email application. Some people enjoy seeing lots of colors, fonts and pictures, while old-school email contains only text with small attachments. Attachments are just files (documents, images, etc.) that can be sent along with the email message. But email is really designed to carry only messages, so there is a limit to the size of attachments.
As mentioned above, many people today prefer to send messages via Facebook. For them, it’s a convenient replacement for email, since they tend to be on Facebook many times each day. For others (like me), it offers doubtful privacy, and is less convenient than email, because they prefer not to be sucked into the swirling maelstrom of status updates and memes on Facebook.
A lot of messages come from other people, like personal letters sent through the postal mail. Many other messages are sent automatically as a service to the recipient. For example, a doctor’s office might send an automatic message reminding you of an upcoming appointment. They do the same thing in The Dalles on the telephone. Just as you can hang up the phone on a recorded message without a second thought, you can also delete any automated message without reading past the subject line, and nobody would think any less of you.
Those who don’t want to receive automatic messages can usually opt out, but messages sent from real people are a different story. Everyone has their own preferences for messages received from another person. Some (like me) prefer only direct, personal messages. Others enjoy receiving general mail forwarded from others containing jokes, political or religious commentary, and the like. When I receive the second type of message, I delete almost all of them without reading them. I just can’t justify the time to look at those messages, when I have some excellent books that have been awaiting my attention for years.
Messages that are forwarded again and again are similar to chain letters that were sent through the postal mail years ago. I remember my mother receiving one when I was very young. She explained to me how those letters are intended to manipulate the recipient to feel guilty or fearful if they don’t make copies and send them out to many others. Some even promised great wealth! Unfortunately, Internet messages like email are much easier to copy and send out to others, so that millions of these messages are circulated around the Internet for years. Many contain bad information. It may sound helpful, but turns out to be wrong. While I respect those who genuinely find them interesting, it would be more sensitive to the desires of others not to forward them onward. Instead of forwarding such a message, perhaps someone who would like to share it could post the message on a web page or blog, and then send only the link to a few personal contacts.
But Internet messages are not only for communication between two people at a time. They can be sent from one person to an entire group of people. The scum of the Internet world are commercial “spammers,” people who send unwanted messages to millions of people and post links that advertise commercial goods or services (often at least partly pornographic in nature, often dishonest scams, and often infected with computer viruses). Email services offer spam filters that attempt to automatically identify and remove these messages from your inbox. Recently, text message spam on phones has become more of a problem, and is especially irritating because the recipient is often charged money for each message received. Facebook spam has also been a problem.
As irritating and wasteful as unwanted commercial spam messages are, there are some very useful and beneficial examples of messages from one person sent out to many. I have participated in email discussions on groups, or lists, that address certain topics. For example, there are lists where users of a certain computer operating system or application could ask questions and get help from many people at the same time. Each group or list has a certain range of topics considered appropriate for discussion. They also have certain expectations for those who participate, about the best ways to ask and answer questions, or what sort of language is appropriate. There is usually a document of frequently asked questions (abbreviated FAQ) for the mailing list, so that elementary questions may be answered quickly, without trying the patience of those who respond and read all of the messages on the list.
A mailing list works like this: each person subscribes by submitting his own email address to the list, which is kept somewhere on a computer that manages the list. The list itself has its own email address, so that when any subscribers send a message to the one list address, the message will automatically be forwarded to all the subscribers. You can see why it’s important to have rules about what sorts of things are appropriate for the list. If anyone on the list accidentally sent a personal message intended for their spouse or coworker to the list email address, then that message would be automatically distributed to the whole group. Sometimes a person subscribes to an email list with the intent of commercially advertising their product or service to the whole group, ignoring the limitations of the list. That’s considered very bad netiquette, and abuse of the list. Likewise, forwarding chain messages to an email list is also considered bad netiquette.
At Bethany and Concordia, we have email lists of our own. They are Google Groups. There is a form that may be used to subscribe on each congregation’s page on our shared web site. Bethany’s group page is here, and Concordia’s is here.
Most of the posts to our email lists are simply announcements. In fact, most of the announcements are automated messages about church calendar events in the coming week, sent out on Friday. However, these are fully-fledged email lists, so that subscribers can also write posts and send them to all subscribers by using the group email address. If you do, please observe these simple guidelines:
- Make sure your message is connected with our congregations or our synod, or at least the interests we share in common.
- Use language that you would use at church.
- Feel free to reply to any messages by sending your reply to the group address, but keep in mind that you may also reply directly to the original sender by sending your reply only to their own personal address.
- Remember that everything you send to the group address will be received by all subscribers, whether they have asked for it or not. Please respect their time and convenience.
We also have a Facebook group for Bethany and Concordia. If you have become a part of that group, you may post messages there as well. The same guidelines apply.
In addition to the Facebook group that allows messages, there is a Facebook Page for Bethany, and soon there will be one for Concordia. You are encouraged to post on those pages as often as you like, but please make sure your posts relate to our churches or our faith in some way. These Pages are a public face of our congregations, and we can use them to help introduce ourselves to others on Facebook.
Other ways we are online
Of course, we have our web site, which includes several features, including:
- Our blog, a kind of online newsletter. In fact, you’re reading it now.
- Our online calendar of events.
- An archive of recent sermons, allowing you to listen to most of them.
- A photo scrapbook.
- A Moodle site for classes, especially youth catechesis.
- A collection of pages that are editable through your web browser (called “Wiki” pages), allowing our members to contribute to them.
- A planning tool for future church services, showing what has been planned, and which hymns we have used back several years.
If our members would like to contribute to these things, or to make use of them, you are most welcome to do so. In particular, the blog, the photo scrapbook, the Moodle site, and the “Wiki” pages are appropriate ways for you to contribute to the online presence of our churches. Just ask Pastor about the thing that may interest you.
Finally, remember that the members of our congregations are always ambassadors for the Gospel and for our churches. Every time you send an email to anyone, you are being a contact between your congregation and others. If you wish, you may even obtain an email address of the form “@bethanythedalles.org”, or “@concordiahoodriver.org”. But even without it, your presence online is the presence of our churches online. In fact, you are even representing your Lord and Savior.
False Religion Pretending to be Science
In a time when there is supposedly a high wall separating church and state, government and religion, this article from American Thinker points out that it’s not true of every faith. In fact, this false religion of Scientism is already well connected with American civil religion, which is another serious matter for Christians in our society.
In other words, many of our politicians are surrendering themselves to scientism. Scientism is not science. It is an ideology that is often confused with science. It is, rather, an abuse of the scientific method and scientific authority.
Scientism can also be classified as a religion. It is a religion with many denominations: Darwinism, environmentalism, feminism, hedonism, humanism, Marxism, socialism, and so on. How many Americans now find their fulfillment and purpose in these movements? They celebrate Earth Day and Darwin Day. They boldly assert, “Science is my Savior.”
A Savior for the Whole World
A recent article in The Dalles Chronicle was about one man’s experience visiting a miracle worker in Brazil whom people call “John of God.” The man in question ended the article with an amazed approval of the miracle worker, emphasizing how John of God accepts people of all religious points of view. I suppose he would have to be accepting, since he mixes several differing points of view into his own miracle working. John of God is nominally Roman Catholic, using the Lord’s Prayer and the Roman Catholic prayer to the mother of Jesus called the Hail Mary. Yet the meditation he teaches, and at least some of the techniques he uses seem to have roots in Hinduism. I doubt that John of God would accept the point of view of those who would gladly kill him for supposedly religious reasons, like Al Qaida. But when I saw this article’s emphasis on how wonderful it was that John of God accepted people of every religious idea, I read it as a veiled attack on historic Christianity, which does not accept differing points of view.
Our society tends to be pluralistic when it comes to religion. The politically-correct standard was once tolerance of opposing viewpoints, but now the standard is acceptance. When a person accepts the position of others in contradiction to his own religion, he becomes something like a convert to the opposing faith. The Israelites before the Babylonian Captivity, for example, made a habit of worshipping Baal and other Canaanite gods, while claiming to continue worshipping the God of Abraham. That’s a pluralistic approach to religion. In fact, it’s about the same thing as syncretism, which holds mutually contradictory faiths as being true, despite the contradictions. Those who have read Orwell’s 1984 will be reminded of the word he coined for this kind of self-contradiction: “doublethink.”
Those who wish to remain faithful to the God of Abraham, whom we know better as the Triune God, are unable to participate in this kind of pluralism. We cannot accept the opinions or beliefs of others when they contradict the teachings of the Bible. It’s not a notion we’ve invented ourselves. Rather, it comes straight from Jesus Christ and His apostles, not to mention the prophets of the Old Testament (Matthew 7:15, Mark 13:22). So we are conscience-bound to take a stand that will be quite unpopular in our world. Because of that, Bible-believing Christians are not politically correct, and we are not well-loved by the world.
You may have noticed that I have to qualify the word “Christian” as “Bible-believing” and “Christianity” as “historic Christianity.” The reason is that many who claim the name “Christian” have accomodated themselves to the political correctness, pluralism and syncretism of this world. The Enemy uses this to paint faithful Christians as irrational, extremist, and even hateful or dangerous. For example, another news story breaking this week says that the Christian owners of the privately-owned national chain store Hobby Lobby intend to disobey the federal government’s mandate to provide a health insurance policy for their employees that includes abortifacient drugs. The Enemy uses stories like this to convince our neighbors that conscientious Christians are not good for our society, but accomodating Christians are more enlightened. Churches like ours are painted as overly zealous and irrational, and the fact that we exclude contradictory teaching is supposed proof of our “hate.”
But we are in the season of Christmas, when we celebrate the birth of a Savior for the whole world. Soon we will also celebrate Epiphany, based upon the Gospel lesson of those gentile Magi who visited the infant Jesus in Bethlehem. The great truth of Epiphany is that Jesus is not an exclusive Savior in the sense that He refused salvation for the Gentiles. He saves them, and that was God’s plan from the start. Jesus is the Savior of both Jews and Gentiles. But He’s also the Savior of both Lutherans and Catholics, of both Hindus and Moslems. He doesn’t exclude anyone on the basis of their family tree, or even their sins. The only way in which He is exclusive is that truth summarized by Peter in Acts 4:12 (NKJV):
“Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
No matter what your religion may be, no matter what your family background or heritage, no matter what sins you may have committed, Jesus is the Savior for you. What really tweaks the world is that He is the only Savior that Christians acknowledge, because He is the only Savior recognized by the true God. While He is perfectly willing to save Hindus, Moslems, and even Atheists alongside lifelong Christians, Jesus requires us to repent of all our false beliefs and sins, and trust in Him alone. In other words, we must be converted, become (conscientious, historic) Christians, and rely upon Jesus alone.
So in these seasons of Christmas and Epiphany, keep this happy message in mind for those you meet: Jesus is their Savior, too! Perhaps they won’t appreciate that just yet, but you won’t know until you try. Maybe the power of God’s Word will work His will in some of them, that they find comfort in the certainty that God loves them, too.
A Beautiful Christmas Gift Idea for Lutherans
Members of our churches have probably heard me talk about this once or twice in the last 7 or 8 years, but unless you listen to it, you won’t really understand how wonderful this is. Then, the more you do listen, the more you will appreciate it, and even love it. It’s a set of 4 music CDs from Concordia Publishing House called Martin Luther: Hymns, Ballads, Chants, Truth, and it’s included on sale in CPH’s annual Christmas catalog. You can also buy it at the sale price on the CPH web site. I see that there is also a sequel that includes chorales (classic Lutheran hymns) from later generations.
Scientists Defend Biblical Worldview against Bill Nye
You, your kids, or grandkids may have heard of Bill Nye the Science Guy. I remember him making science a little more fun and fascinating years ago. But apparently he’s been making comments against the biblical worldview, saying that Evolution is basically proven. There have been a few segments on the Issues, Etc. radio program addressing Nye’s comments. For example, this scientist points out that one fatal flaw of the theory of evolution is that there is no known mechanism for one life form to be transformed into another kind of life form. To see other segments on Bill Nye, you can search the archives at Issues, Etc. for “Bill Nye”.
Devotions feed updated/fixed
Unknown to me, the RSS2 feed on our church homepage for twice-daily devotions has not been producing a 100%-approved feed. Now it’s fixed, so it should work in all feed readers. I’ve recently begun using Google Reader, for example, because it synchronizes with other tools. Now, it works with our twice-daily devotions.
If you don’t know what any of this is about, here’s the scoop. A special link on our home page (Here via Bethany’s name, or Here via Concordia’s name). automatically provides links to excerpts from the Bible every day. On Sunday, it shows the historic readings for that Sunday in the Church Year. Every other day, it shows the morning and evening readings from the daily lectionary found in The Lutheran Hymnal and in the companion book of The Lutheran Hymnary called the Book of Family Prayer. Also included in these devotions are readings from the Monthly Psalter, which takes the reader through all of the Psalms every month.
If you haven’t tried it yet, please do! And share it with someone else!
A Detailed Survey of the Bible
Do you wish you knew more about the actual contents of the Bible? We have begun an ongoing series of classes called Getting Into God’s Word, which introduces students to every different kind of writing in holy scripture, and leads us into each of them by covering specific books and chapters. But even if you have taken advantage of these classes, would you like to be more familiar with all of the events and teaching in holy scripture?
The Christian faith is unique among the world’s religions, because it’s tied closely with the history of the world. While Muhammad is certainly a person who really lived, the central figure in Christianity is much more than a prophet of God. Jesus Himself is divine, the eternal Son of God, yet lived, moved, performed miracles, and taught at a very specific time in world history. His disciples continued that teaching after Jesus ascended to heaven, as history continued. False religions have no more historic evidence in their support than the false prophets who taught them, but Christianity includes detailed claims about the course of human events from the dawn of time, and many of those claims are supported by evidence from outside the Bible!
Wouldn’t you love to be more familiar with the story of the world as presented in the Bible? It’s also the story of salvation for every member of the human race. Such a knowledge would help you to judge between religious or historical claims you hear on television, in school, or at work. Even more importantly, such a knowledge would deepen your own Christian faith.
For that reason, I am considering offering a special class in our parish when the time is right. It’s called “The Story of Jesus the Messiah,” covering most of the Bible in survey form, over 96 lessons. We would start with 32 lessons on the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). This course would be different from the kind of classes we have held in the past. Most of the learning would be done individually, just you and your Bible(s). We would meet weekly, maybe for only about a half-hour, so that I can monitor your progress and keep the class on track together. Your work at home each week would probably take from about half an hour to about two hours. If you wish to go slowly, it could take longer.
The class would cost almost $14 per student for each of three units. The price includes a workbook for each student. We could possibly have our churches subsidize that cost, so that the final price per student could be around $10 or so. I’m considering advertising this class to our communities, as it may interest some of our neighbors, and they may wish to join us.
If you would be interested in such a class, or would at least wish to learn your Bible better, then look for a sign-up sheet to be posted at church. We will need to find a time for these meetings. Some could be done during Lutheran Family Fellowship. Some could be done immediately after services, including mid-week services. Concordia’s Sunday Bible class, or Bethany’s Confessing Jesus class could give some of their time, too. We could conduct part of the lesson, including online discussion, on the Moodle part of our web site. You may have other, better ideas. If so, please speak up, and voice your interest in such a class.
The Sabbath Day
We received an anonymous postcard at Concordia containing only a few hand-written Bible references. They all relate to the institution of the Sabbath Day, or the Day of Rest among the people of Israel. Since there is no way to communicate directly with the sender of this postcard, I will post a response here in the hope that it will be found.
God commanded the Israelites to observe the Sabbath Day in the Ten Commandments, and connected this commandment with the order of Creation. God Himself rested on the seventh day, and so He set it apart (sanctified it) for this special use.
The commandment regarding the Sabbath was given in the context of the Ten Commandments, which were part of the covenant that God established with Israel. The Ten Commandments were also a summary of the moral law, written in paradise upon the heart of man, before the Fall into sin. However, the covenant included more than the moral law. There were also ceremonial (worship) laws and civil laws for Israel to follow. Some of them were replaced during the 1,450 years between the Exodus and the birth of the Messiah, because the civil arrangement of the Israelites changed dramatically through that period. Even the ceremonial laws were not always implemented rigorously. In fact, it seems they were rarely kept according to God’s original commands.
While the Ten Commandments summarize moral law, the commandment about the Sabbath Day is a little different. In addition to moral law, it also relates to the specific worship practices that God wanted the Israelites to follow. It was not cancelled in New Testament times by anyone. Rather, it was fulfilled along with the rest of the commandments by Jesus Christ. Those who believe in Jesus have both forgiveness of their sins and righteousness in God’s sight, including the righteousness that Jesus earned by keeping the Sabbath. These are gifts from God, not a result of our own efforts. They come through faith, not by our own works of righteousness.
For God’s people in these New Testament times, the Ten Commandments are still helpful. Inasmuch as they summarize the moral law for us, they tell us how God would have all people live at all times. So we teach them all as binding upon Christians today, though not as a condition for obtaining salvation.
With regard to the Sabbath Day, we follow the word of God as written by St. Paul in Colossians 2:16-17, “So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.” We do not object to anyone observing the Sabbath, but we do object to the imposition of this observance as a condition for salvation. Consider that this question was part of the issue before the apostolic council in Acts 15, but they did not ask Gentile Christians to observe the Sabbath.
A fuller explanation of our position on this may be found in the [Lutheran Confessions][lc], especially the Large Catechism on the [Third Commandment][tc]. Please consider that as having been repeated here. All of the Bible passages cited on the postcard we received are in harmony with the Lutheran position on the Sabbath Day.
Weekly Parish Schedule
Since the birth of our newest gifts from God, the twins Leah and Lucy, I’ve been in a period of adjustment in keeping the weekly parish schedule. In case anyone is not aware, the schedule stands as follows:
- Sundays are work days. We often include classes or meetings Sunday afternoon or evening. Usually, the work day is finished some time in the afternoon. After that, I begin my “weekend.”
- Mondays are for the pastor’s family. Occasionally there are meetings or conferences that fall on Mondays. In those weeks, we usually skip the “pastor’s family” day.
- Tuesdays have been designated for work in and around The Dalles, but last year’s parish discussion about our weekly schedule included an encouragement that at least part of Tuesday should be a continuation of Pastor’s “weekend.” Since most church meetings are not scheduled until Tuesday evening, I’ve been taking Tuesdays as an additional “family day,” but also holding the possibility of a church activity scheduled any time on Tuesday. Some conferences fall on Tuesdays, including our monthly winkel with pastors in northern Oregon.
- Wednesdays have been designated for work in and around Hood River. When I can, I avoid scheduling anything in The Dalles on a Wednesday. I usually aim to leave Hood River at 5:30 PM, but the evening hours are still available for meetings in the Hood River area. The only times we have usually had such meetings are the seasons of Advent or Lent, when we may schedule mid-week services at Concordia. It has been convenient to schedule meetings in Klickitat late Wednesday afternoon, because I can stop there on the way back to The Dalles. When in Hood River, I typically prepare quick meals in the church kitchen.
- Thursday mornings are designated for work in and around The Dalles. I usually head home between 12:00 and 1:00 for lunch at home. An hour or so later, I travel to Hood River, where the remainder of the day’s work is to happen. The afternoon/evening are handled like Wednesday, except we don’t usually have any meetings in Hood River on Thursday evenings. Confirmation classes often meet on Wednesday or Thursday afternoons.
- Fridays are designated for work in and around The Dalles. When an event is scheduled at Bethany on Tuesday evening, Friday evening is the first weeknight available for other work in The Dalles. Many people avoid committing to meetings on Friday evening or Saturday, so it can be challenging to find a weeknight for weekly meetings in The Dalles. We have had confirmation class on Friday mornings or afternoons in The Dalles, coinciding with District 21′s late start/early release program.
- Saturdays are also designated for work in and around The Dalles. Bethany’s elders have been meeting monthly on Saturday mornings, and our men’s breakfast was meeting just before that. Saturdays can be a convenient time for meeting with individuals. Saturday evenings, from 5 to 6 PM, I have a scheduled regular time for private absolution. Members of either church are welcome to take advantage of this time.
There are often extra things we would like to include in the schedule, and there are always compromises to be made. I usually like to be working by 9 AM, but that schedule has rarely been met in the last six months. Most days I’m up between 5:30 and 6:30 AM, well ahead of 9, but I am needed in various and unpredictable ways for up to three hours as my dear wife tries to make up for precious sleep lost overnight. Between meeting those needs, getting in some extra work on projects, and preparing for the day, I have found it impossible to maintain a regular morning schedule. I’ve even tried scheduling meetings at 9 AM in the hope that the necessity would impose a regularity to my mornings, but it hasn’t worked yet. I must apologize again to those whose meetings I have missed. (You know who you are.)
I’m open to any improvements you may have for our weekly parish schedule, recognizing that it represents a compromise between the churches in our parish, and between my duties at home and at church. As far as I can tell, there’s no quick fix for my variable morning schedule. I do have an idea, however, that might help. In the last seven months I have mostly abandoned [the personal organization system][gtd] that I’d been using up through December, 2011. Back when I couldn’t predict what I’d be doing in the next hour or two, it was an unneeded layer of complexity. But now, things have settled enough so that I may be able to regain some control over the workflows of my life. I’m going to revisit that system and see how it works.
– Pastor